VHDL WatchDog/(One-Shot)

Guest #6299958
Rate this post
• ▲ useful
▼ not useful
Alexander S. wrote:
> See attached files.
Thanks.

Using both clock edges in a design is calling for trouble. In your 
watchdog design it is absolutley not necessary:
1
process (ClockIn)
2
begin
3
if ClockIn'event and ClockIn = '0' then
4
...
5
 RequestRise_Process:
6
process (ClockIn)
7
begin
8
 if(ClockIn'event and ClockIn = '1') then

I prefer maximum readability of vhdl sources, so I use more indentation 
an rising_edge() for clocks.

Duke
OP (Company: Home) #6300176
Rate this post
• ▲ useful
▼ not useful
Duke Scarring wrote:
> Alexander S. wrote:
>> See attached files.
> Thanks.
>
> Using both clock edges in a design is calling for trouble. In your
> watchdog design it is absolutley not necessary:
>
1
> process (ClockIn)
2
> begin
3
> if ClockIn'event and ClockIn = '0' then
4
> ...
5
>  RequestRise_Process:
6
> process (ClockIn)
7
> begin
8
>  if(ClockIn'event and ClockIn = '1') then
9
>
> Duke

 You're right .

 It's my old design.

 Flip Flops does not work by clock's Fall  , synthesis tools must add 
some components for invert clock.

 See attached design after repair.

 Regards Alex.
Attached files:

Reply

Note: the original post is older than 6 months. Please don't ask any new questions in this thread, but start a new one.

Formatting
  • [c]C-Code[/c]
  • [vhdl]VHDL-Code[/vhdl]
  • [code]code in other languages, ASCII drawings[/code]
  • [math]formula (LaTeX syntax)[/math]
  • [[Title]] – link to an article
  • Link to another post: right-click its post ID (#8078628), copy the address, paste it into the text

More about formatting

Post long source code as an attachment, not in the text.

Already registered? Log in

Not shown to anyone. We send you a link; your post appears once you confirm it there.

By submitting you create a free account and accept the terms of use.