VHDL Generic Decoder

Griz Lee wrote:
> You published pretty lot of files today, but a closer look shows, most
> of them are simple and some even faulty and crappy. This is not standard
> code quality.
>
> What do you intend to achieve by that?
>
> Did you get sucked and want to open your work? Or is that a part of your
> bachelor thesis piece?

 Lot of this design work in the real design many years.
But sometimes we see problem after many years.

 Can you help me repeir it according to good practice design and 
standard code quality ?

 Perhaps it's will help to other designer work according good practice 
design and standard code quality !


 Regards Alex.

Achim S. wrote:
> that he alone is responsible for ~80% of the
> contributions (which is - in some unpleasant meaning - even true at the
> moment).

 Where you read that ?

Achim S. wrote:

> Can you describe any specific problem of your generic decoder which
> showed up after "it worked many years in real"?

 I don't know problem in my designs. Sometime problem may be one time in 
the year.

 Designers with experience such as you can see problem in the design and 
can protect that.

 Regards Alex.