Hi in light of the recent aircraft accidents, i was wondering why the locator beacons are fixed frequency at 37 kHz. Wouldn't it be better if they emit a known time structure e.g. Chirp or the like. That would not only make the range much better but also virtually remove the possibility of spurious signals. Any ideas why they don't do that?
The ultrasonic transducer is probably narrow band with a bandwidth of around 1 kHz. That is why you can not transmit any broadband pulse like a chirp.
apinger wrote: > Any ideas why they don't do that? I guess its due to the fact that the overwhelming amount of the pingers will never be used in all their lifetime - so they try to keep this as cheap as possible but still functioning. Making the transducer resonant to a single frequency keeps it loud but still energy efficient enough to work for a month.
Resonant emitters are usually more energy efficient. There could be still a slow modulation like a pulse structure (e.g. 1 pulse of 0.5 seconds every 10 seconds) if the power is limited by the battery and not by the transducer. For me the question is a little why they choose such a high frequency. Lower frequency sound has less damping and thus a longer range.
Lurchi wrote: > For me the question is a little why they choose such a high frequency. > Lower frequency sound has less damping and thus a longer range. Its still low enough to not be confused with echo transducers from ships' depth measuring equipment in the 100-200kHz range and high enough to be no natural sound. It also requires larger transducers to emit deeper sounds efficently and both size and weigth is limited in aircraft equipment.
mscho wrote: > Its still low enough to not be confused with echo transducers from > ships' depth measuring equipment in the 100-200kHz range and high enough > to be no natural sound. These are flat water echo sounders only. For deep water echo sounders are using frequencies in the 50 kHz range. Have a look to Raymarine or what ever. Echosounder for fishery requirements use a broad range of transducer at 38 kHz and many other frequencies. SimRad https://www.simrad.com/www/01/nokbg0240.nsf/AllWeb/3E3ABDF14A22990DC12570AD0034AD3B?OpenDocument
38 kHz seems like a bad choice for fish finders. one fishing vessel in proximity and boom fake signal. The power of these sonars is immense and sind can be guided over long distances between water layers.
Lurchi wrote: > > For me the question is a little why they choose such a high frequency. > Lower frequency sound has less damping and thus a longer range. Newer ones come in sub 10 kHz also and are mandatory now.
Watch this topic
Disable multi-page viewPlease log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
Do you have a Google/GoogleMail account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account
Log in with Google account
No account? Register here.