Increasing dutycycle for an output signal

Robert Guest #4245985
Rate this post
• ▲ useful
▼ not useful 
Hi all,

I want to increase the duty cycle slowly from 0%-50% in the period of 
0-10 ms for an output signal(150KHz) generated from a clock of 50MHz.

I am able to generate the output for 50%. I am not sure how to vary the 
duty cycle from 0-50% (between 0-10ms). Below is the code:

1
entity Gen_150 is

2
port ( sys_clk,reset: in std_logic; --sys_clk:50MHz

3
a_out, b_out: out std_logic);       --a_out,b_out:150KHz

4
end Gen_150 ;

5
 

6
architecture bhv of Gen_150 is

7
 

8
signal count: integer:=0;

9
signal tmp : std_logic := '1';

10


11
begin

12
 

13
process(sys_clk,reset)

14
begin

15
if(reset='0') then

16
count<=0;

17
tmp<='1';

18
elsif(sys_clk'event and sys_clk='1') then

19
  count <=count+1;

20


21
  if (count = 166) then   -- dutycycle=50% ((50000000/150000)/2)

22
     tmp <= NOT tmp;

23
     count<= 0;  

24
  end if;

25
end if;

26
a_out <= tmp;

27
b_out <= NOT tmp after 10ns; -- output delayed by 10ns

28
end process;

29
 

30
end bhv;


Thank you!
Reply Quote Edit Move Thread sperren Anmeldepflicht aktivieren Anpinnen Delete topic Thread mit anderem zusammenführen Report post
Lothar M. Moderator (Company: Titel) #4246005
Rate this post
• ▲ useful
▼ not useful 
Robert wrote:
> Below is the code:
> entity Gen_150 is
A VHDL code start well before the keyword "entity"...


> b_out <= NOT tmp after 10ns; -- output delayed by 10ns
Thats not synthesizeable! You know that?


> I want to increase the duty cycle slowly from 0%-50%
Try that and change the value of pwm:
1
signal count: integer:=0;

2
signal pwm: integer:=100;

3
:

4
:

5
elsif(sys_clk'event and sys_clk='1') then

6
  count <=count+1;

7


8
  if (count = 332) then

9
     count <= 0;  

10
  end if;

11
   

12
end if;

13


14
tmp <= '1' when (count < pwm) else '0';

15
:

16
:

17
end process;

Now you have a changing output signal. And the only thing you must du, 
is to produce a ramp on the "pwm" signal. Thats fairly easy...
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report post
Robert Guest #4246097
Rate this post
• ▲ useful
▼ not useful 
Thank you!
I implemented the ramping function with a counter=500000 (0-10ms). 
Please correct if I am wrong.

And I am getting an syntax error for the below:

tmp <= '1' when(count < pwm) else tmp <= '0';

1
library IEEE;

2
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_1164.ALL;

3
use IEEE.numeric_std.ALL;

4
 

5
entity Gen_150 is

6
port ( sys_clk,reset: in std_logic;

7
a_out, b_out: out std_logic);

8
end Gen_150 ;

9
 

10
architecture bhv of Gen_150 is

11
 

12
signal count: integer:=0;

13
signal tmp : std_logic := '1';

14
signal counter: integer := 0;

15
signal pwm: integer := 0;

16


17
begin

18
 

19
process(sys_clk,reset)

20
begin

21
if(reset='0') then

22
count<=0;

23
tmp<='1';

24
elsif(sys_clk'event and sys_clk='1') then

25
  count <=count+1;

26
  --counter <= counter +1;

27
  if (count = 332) then

28
    -- tmp <= NOT tmp;

29
     count<= 0;  

30
  end if;

31
end if;

32
tmp <= '1' when(count < pwm) else tmp <= '0'; 

33


34
a_out <= tmp;

35
b_out <= NOT tmp;

36


37
end process;

38


39
Ramp : process (reset, sys_clk)

40
begin

41
  if reset = '0' then

42
    pwm      <= 0;

43
  elsif rising_edge(sys_clk)  then

44
    counter <= counter +1;

45
    if counter<=500000 then -- 500000 cycles =10ms

46
      

47
        case  counter  is

48
          when  50000     =>  pwm  <= 25;    

49
          when  100000  =>  pwm  <= 33;  

50
          when  150000  =>  pwm  <= 44;  

51
          when  200000  =>  pwm  <= 66;  

52
          when  250000  =>  pwm  <= 77;  

53
          when  300000  =>  pwm  <= 99;            

54
          when  350000  =>  pwm  <= 120;  

55
          when  400000  =>  pwm  <= 132;  

56
          when  450000  =>  pwm  <= 145;  

57
          when  500000  =>  pwm  <= 166;  

58
          

59
          when  others  =>  pwm  <= 0;    

60
        end case;

61
      

62
    else

63
      pwm      <= 0;

64
    end if;

65
  end if;

66


67
end process Ramp;

68
 

69
end bhv;
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report post
Lothar M. Moderator (Company: Titel) #4246111
Rate this post
• ▲ useful
▼ not useful 
Robert wrote:
> And I am getting an syntax error for the below:
>
> tmp <= '1' when(count < pwm) else tmp <= '0';
Of course you do. What's the correct syntax for the when/else statement?
Why didn't you simply copy it from me?
Mine will not conclude in an error message.

And for the PWM value: let start it from 0. And then increment it every 
500000/166 clocks. So you will only need an additional counter from 0 to 
500000/166. And when the counter reaches that value you must reset it to 
0 and increment the PWM value until its 166.

You see that there's no whatsoever "case" statement necessary at all and 
the PWM value will increase smoothly from 0 to 166...
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report post
Robert Guest #4246119
Rate this post
• ▲ useful
▼ not useful 
Lothar M. wrote:
> Robert wrote:
>> And I am getting an syntax error for the below:
>>
>> tmp <= '1' when(count < pwm) else tmp <= '0';
> Of course you do. What's the correct syntax for the when/else statement?
> Why didn't you simply copy it from me?
> Mine will not conclude in an error message.

Sorry it was my mistake. Its fine now. But is the ramp function 
implemented correct?
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report post
Robert Guest #4247830
Rate this post
• ▲ useful
▼ not useful 
I want to add delays between the outputs (a_out and b_out).

Is it ok to add a min delay(is 10ns too much?) just by adding a temp 
register to delay out_b?

1
if(reset='0') then

2
count<=0;

3
tmp<='1';

4
elsif(sys_clk'event and sys_clk='1') then

5
:

6
:

7
end if;

8
end if;

9
a_out <= tmp; -- at falling edge

10
d_b_out <= NOT tmp; -- at falling edge

11
b_out <= d_b_out; -- delayed by 10ns - at rising edge

12
:

13
:


I am not sure as the Input clock has a frequeny of 50MHz and the outputs 
are at 150KHz.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report post
Wil Guest #4266617
Rate this post
• ▲ useful
▼ not useful 
How do I introduce a 180° phase shift between a_out and b_out. I tried 
using an inverting output. But when dutycycle is 10% for a_out, it is 
90% for b_out. But I want a 10% dutycycle for b_out with 180° phase 
shift.

Any suggestions?
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report post
Lothar M. Moderator (Company: Titel) #4266707
Rate this post
• ▲ useful
▼ not useful 
Wil wrote:
> How do I introduce a 180° phase shift between a_out and b_out.
> I tried using an inverting output.
A phase shift is only defined for sinusoidal signals. And then inverting 
is correct.

> How do I introduce a 180° phase shift between a_out and b_out.
What you want in fact is a delay of half the cycle duration for one of 
the signals.
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report post
Watch this topic

Reply

Please log in before posting.

Existing account

or

Log in with Google account

No account?

Registration is free and takes only a minute.

Register now