Hi Is there anyone on this forum who can help me write a verilog program for a stopwatch. I need it within the next two days to pass my subject. I am attaching the problem sheet. This is a completely new language for me and if anyone out there can help it would be much appreciated. I need to design a stopwatch with three input buttons button1:start/stop button2:reset button3:lap And n display output of hh mm ss(hours minutes seconds) hours go from 0-99 minutes 0-59 seconds 0-59
Navtej Johal wrote: > I need it within the next two days to pass my subject Thats not the way things work here! Let's try it the other way: you show us what you have and tell us about particular problems. THEN we can discuss that problems. But no one is intended to do your homework (which you have laying around at least days...). BTW: did you read the last sentence on that sheet? And: Did you try Google? http://www.google.com/search?q=stop+watch+verilog
Hey hello, I have a problem here! A am designing 4:1 mux using 2:1 (Structural). In 2:1 mux I have written like this, module mux2to1(y,i,s); input [1:0] i; I am using this as a instance in 4:1 prog, where I am giving inputs as wire sig1,sig2; mux2to1 u1(y,sig1,sig2,s0); Error is : Too many port connections. Expected 3, found 4. It means thing is that 'i' input in mux 2:1 is recognized as a single input by software though I am defining it [1:0] in next line.. Is there any different solution available ? Or I simply have to do like mux2to1(y,i0,i1,s);
Guest
#3782552
Pratik Kulkarni wrote: > > module mux2to1(y,i,s); > input [1:0] i; > > I am using this as a instance in 4:1 prog, > where I am giving inputs as > > wire sig1,sig2; > mux2to1 u1(y,sig1,sig2,s0); > > Error is : Too many port connections. Expected 3, found 4. >
1 | |
please help me to write the verilog program for this.
Prasanna M. wrote: > please help me to write the verilog program for this. There is the first step to the solution: http://embdev.net/topic/342471#3775885 BTW: did you read the thread in front of you? I am very sure you did not! Because the very SAME exercise and question can be found in the FIRST post of this thread!