I see many codes that use VHDL process in the combinational. Why is this so common? Why not use constructs suitable for combinational circuits instead of using process as often? Everything that can be done with the process can be done without the process when it comes to combinational, is not it? So what is the justification?
Guest
#3305832
verilogin verilogin wrote: > So what is the > justification? Readability and maintenance. Duke
verilogin verilogin wrote: > Everything that can be done with the process can be done without the > process when it comes to combinational, is not it? So what is the > justification? Lots of VHDL "programmers" did software programming previously. And to plenty of them a VHDL procedure looks like a C or BASIC subroutine. And so every functionality is wrapped in its own process...
Reply
Please log in before posting.