Hi everyone. we had performed a project with discovery f746 board that within it there just was a GUI task to run emwin functions. Another functions(such as reading and writing in sd card by fatfs , usb, spi and stuff) were placed in the routines of Buttons. After several times the process of USB (writing in USB flash memory) was ran , the running process stuck in RTOS's functions. After that we decided to add another thread for USB In such a way that, after pressing related button ,a message is sent to this thread. At the first it works fine but after several times running this thread, mkdir function (for creating a folder in USB flash memory) returns FR_NOT_ENOUGH_CORE value and the program stops running. For resolving this problem we increased stack and heap size and memory that is assigned to the thread but it didn't affect. In new version of our project we just added a new thread and the routine that was placed in Notification sent by related button was moved into new thread and another sections of projects haven't changed. In old version of project that there just was one thread , mkdir function never had returned FR_NOT_ENOUGH_CORE value. It seems this problem is related to multi threading but we don't know how to find out running process and fix problem. Could anyone help us to resolve this problem? We'll appreciate your suggestions.
Hi, can you monitor the memory consumption of the threads? For me this sounds like a memory leak. (I.e. the thread allocates new memory every time it runs without freeing it afterwards.) Best regards, Martin L.
Well, many external devices are to be considered a resource, and thus can only be accessed by one thread at the time. Protect them with a semaphore.
Hi Martin. Thanks for your reply. Actually i don't know how to monitor the memory consumption of the thread and i don't know if there is a function to free the memory allocated to thread.
Above links broken, So, you can use Debugging Programs with Multiple Threads. When dealing with debugging multi-threaded application, it is better not to use standard breakpoints that suspend just the thread where the breakpoint is set. Defining a standard breakpoint in your application, will only break the related thread. The other threads will be still running. For more visit at this link https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1695268/multi-threaded-debugging-tutorial-for-gdb-and-c
Watch this topic
Disable multi-page viewPlease log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
Do you have a Google/GoogleMail account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account
Log in with Google account
No account? Register here.