hi
i want to use pass transistor to design 4 to 1 switch and use vhdl
hat somebody help me?
thanks

> pass transistor
Can you specify what is meant by this term?
A bidirectional 4:1 multipexer?

Lothar Miller schrieb:

> A bidirectional 4:1 multipexer?

yes.the task is to design inputswitch use pass transistor instead of use 
multipexer.

So you have a component "pass transistor"?
Or do you have to describe such a "pass transistor"?

i have no component.so i have to do it

all fb can be 2and or 2nand .use switch to choice a inputsigal to fb and 
output too in same fb.

> something like this?
The bidirectional behaviour is missing in this description  :-/

> i have no component.so i have to do it
So this looks like very low-level design. If you want to describe a 
bidirectional switch, most of the work will be the resolution 
function.
Given the three ports A, B and C you must handle e.g.
what happens if A = '1' while B = '0' and C = '1' (open)
or
what happens if A = '1' while B = '0' and C = '0' (closed)

1

            A

2

3

            |

4

          |-

5

    C ----|

6

          |-

7

            |

8

9

            B

So such a pass transistor may look this way:

1

library IEEE;

2

use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_1164.ALL;

3

4

entity PassTransistor is

5

    Port ( A : inout  STD_LOGIC;

6

           B : inout  STD_LOGIC;

7

           C : in  STD_LOGIC);

8

end PassTransistor;

9

10

architecture Behavioral of PassTransistor is

11

begin

12

  A <= 'Z' when (C='1') else

13

       '1' when (B='1' and C='0') else

14

       '0' when (B='0' and C='0') else

15

       'X';

16

17

  B <= 'Z' when (C='1') else

18

       '1' when (A='1' and C='0') else

19

       '0' when (A='0' and C='0') else

20

       'X';

21

end Behavioral;

In a simplified way by using the resolution function od std_logic you 
can write

1

  A <= B when (C='0') else 'Z';

2

  B <= A when (C='0') else 'Z';

> all fb can be 2and or 2nand .use switch to choice a inputsigal to fb and
> output too in same fb.
I urge you to get known to the terms and phrases used in your business. 
In your picture theres absolutely no bidirectional path, so its just a 
straight forward mux.
Have a look at the code posted by berndl, thats a mux.

But i don't clearly understand your picture. When you have 4 function 
outputs and afterwards a mux to 4 signals, which of the outputs must be 
routed to which signal. Can you scetch one or two signal paths in your 
picture?

this is a test path . 2 inputs and 1 output

What happens here with the other 6 inputs and 3 outputs?

In your sketch you have 4 dual inputs, 4 function blocks and 4 outputs. 
This results in 64 possible routings, how can you handle this with a 2 
bit input? The main problem to understand is why you have 4 outputs.

Lothar Miller schrieb:


<What happens here with the other 6 inputs and 3 outputs?

other 6 inputs and 3 outputs do nothing.because only one funktion block 
aviable with the switch

> other 6 inputs and 3 outputs do nothing.
"Nothing" is no option. For shure they will do something  ;-)

OK, lets give the kids some names:

1

inputs     functions   outputs

2

in0a          fb0        out0

3

in0b

4

5

in1a          fb1        out1

6

in1b

7

8

in2a          fb2        out2

9

in2b

10

11

in3a          fb3        out3

12

in3b

Are the only routing possibilities e.g. in0 - fb0 - out0
or in1 - fb1 - out1 ...

Or can e.g. the in0 ever be routed to out3 through fb2?

Lothar Miller schrieb:
>> other 6 inputs and 3 outputs do nothing.
> "Nothing" is no option. For shure they will do something  ;-)
>
> OK, lets give the kids some names:
>

1

> inputs     functions   outputs

2

> in0a          fb0        out0

3

> in0b

4

> 

5

> in1a          fb1        out1

6

> in1b

7

> 

8

> in2a          fb2        out2

9

> in2b

10

> 

11

> in3a          fb3        out3

12

> in3b

13

>

> Are the only routing possibilities e.g. in0 - fb0 - out0
> or in1 - fb1 - out1 ...
inoa in0b  fb0 out0


> Or can e.g. the in0 ever be routed to out3 through fb2?
this can be in3a in3b fb1 out3 too

> this can be in3a in3b fb1 out3 too
So it will be
inXa inXb   fbY  outX     with (X=0..3, Y=0..3)
but never
inXa inXb   fbY  outZ     with (X=0..3, Y=0..3, Z=0..3, Z/=X)


So how do you select one of the 4 input pairs to one of the 4 fb input 
pairs (these are 4x4=16 possible ways) with only 2 bits?

> ... dass man sich damit schwer schlagbare Konkurrenz schafft.
Glaube ich nicht, bzw. macht mir keine Sorge   ;-)

Lothar Miller schrieb:
>> other 6 inputs and 3 outputs do nothing.
I think it should work like this:
- One of the "2-inputs" on the left should be switched to the input of 
ALL function blocks in the middle (the rest three left inputs are 
ignored)
- One of the FB outputs schould then be selected as output (the rest are 
High-Z, don't cares or holding the last output)

Probably for a testing devices/input one after the other with just 
needing the 4 Input blocks once.

Grashalmlängenkontrollminister schrieb:
> Looks like homework...
I agree with that especially the terminus 'pass transistor' more sounds 
like he should construct a complex-cmos-device than a VHDL code...

Because when my assumption is true, this task could be more easily be 
acomplished by a pipeline than by such a strange 
"pass-transistor-design"...

Driven by the electronization of cars at large, vehicle-used PCBs will 
also increase. Vehicle-used PCBs are characterized by having steady 
order and high gross profit rates, which have drawn great attention from 
many PCB insiders to this new blue ocean. Vehicle-used PCB are mainly 
oepratd in a high-speed context, which made the requirements for this 
kind of PCB higher than that of ordinary ICT products specifications in 
terms of temperature resistance, electromagnetic waves proof, earthquake 
proof and corrosion resistance. As a result, to guarantee the quality of 
car parts and ensure the life safety of driving and passengers is an 
important issue faces by all the car manufacturers; whether car parts 
vendors can provide a long-term and stable quality is far more important 
than that of the low-price ones. Besides, the car manufacturers’ 
inspection for products tends to last as long as three years. Therefore, 
PCB manufacturers who would like to march into the car electronic syply 
chain usually need more patience and strength. http://www.pcbindex.com