Winarm & Crossworks

Amit Chatre wrote:
> Hi ,
>     Using winarm I tested my touchscreen driver.In touchscreen interface
> I used a onchip adc (AD0 and AD1). Its working well.
>     But when I port this code on crossworks Its not working properly.
> Adc readings are varing automatically. when I touch to touchscreen it
> gives some wrong reading and when i realease my touch it also gives some
> readings.
First check the versions of the GNU-tools used by Crossworks. Maybe it's
just an optimization-issue which did not show up with older tools (as
maybe in WinARM). Check for missing volatiles and correct handling of
IRQs (setup, handlers). Check that the compiler-options passed by the
Crossworks-IDE to the GNU-tools (arm-*-gcc...) are the same as with your
standalone-build. Check if the generated linker-script from Crossworks
leads to the same memory-layout as the one from the standalone-build
(map-file).

> please tell me if is ther any changes required in prototype definition
> or any in crossworks.
Sorry, I do not understand this questions but may not be able to help
anyway since I do not have Crossworks. Since Crossworks is a commercial
product: did you ask Rowley's support?

> or what may be the issue when same files are working well in winarm and
> not working in crossworks.
If nothing helps look into the disassemblies (generate with objdump)
from both builds and check for differences.

Martin Thomas wrote:
> Amit Chatre wrote:
>> Hi ,
>>     Using winarm I tested my touchscreen driver.In touchscreen interface
>> I used a onchip adc (AD0 and AD1). Its working well.
>>     But when I port this code on crossworks Its not working properly.
>> Adc readings are varing automatically. when I touch to touchscreen it
>> gives some wrong reading and when i realease my touch it also gives some
>> readings.
> First check the versions of the GNU-tools used by Crossworks. Maybe it's

GNU-tool version is 3.4.4 & I used adc in polling mode only.
Even I have not added any compiler option it just work on default
settings.

> just an optimization-issue which did not show up with older tools (as
> maybe in WinARM). Check for missing volatiles and correct handling of
> IRQs (setup, handlers). Check that the compiler-options passed by the
> Crossworks-IDE to the GNU-tools (arm-*-gcc...) are the same as with your
> standalone-build. Check if the generated linker-script from Crossworks
> leads to the same memory-layout as the one from the standalone-build
> (map-file).

>
>> please tell me if is ther any changes required in prototype definition
>> or any in crossworks.
> Sorry, I do not understand this questions but may not be able to help
> anyway since I do not have Crossworks. Since Crossworks is a commercial
> product: did you ask Rowley's support?
>
?

>> or what may be the issue when same files are working well in winarm and
>> not working in crossworks.
> If nothing helps look into the disassemblies (generate with objdump)
Is winarm generates the disassembly code?if yes please tell me the way,
how to generate disassemblies?
> from both builds and check for differences.

>...
> Is winarm generates the disassembly code?if yes please tell me the way,
> how to generate disassemblies?
>...
As already mentioned: use objdump
(arm-elf-objdump/arm-none-eabi-objdump).  I don't know the needed
settings for the Crossworks-IDE. If you are using a makefile based on
one of my WinARM templates the disassembly is generated as file with
extension .lss (as with the WinAVR sample-makefiles).