I am trying to standardize on one Atmel lib (ie lib_AT91SAM7S256.h) as inline C functions. Some or Martins example projects "#define __inline extern inline" which causes a bunch of linker issues if separate C files include the lib. I expect the define must be "#define __inline static inline" to keep distinct function names as seen by the linker. Is this correct? Why would inline functions every be declared extern? I have standardized the lib so I can build efsl, freertos, usb (hid) all together. So far I can succesfully build and have tested everything but the USB. David.
Guest
#1172230
David Farrell wrote: > I am trying to standardize on one Atmel lib (ie lib_AT91SAM7S256.h) as > inline > C functions. Some or Martins example projects "#define __inline extern > inline" which causes a bunch of linker issues if separate C files > include the lib. I expect the define must be "#define __inline static > inline" to keep distinct function names as seen by the linker. Is this > correct? Why would inline functions every be declared extern? static inline is correct and should be like this in the AT91 examples I provide. Maybe you have older versions of the examples. Some of the examples which come with the WinARM-package may be outdated. Please see my ARM-projects page at http://www.siwawi.arubi.uni-kl.de/avr_projects/arm_projects for updates. If you are still finding "extern inline" please send my the name of the package and I will provide an updated version with "static inline". > I have standardized the lib so I can build efsl, freertos, usb (hid) all > together. So far I can succesfully build and have tested everything but > the USB. If you wish I can place your code on my ARM-projects pages or can place a link to your pages there. Martin Thomas