Hello all I am making a RS232 - datalogger for my MasterThesis in the university. My environment is BDI2000 debugger GNU toolchain - WinARM AT91RM9200-EK The work is simply to take input signals from the USART port and send it to the SD card. Can anyone please answer the following quesitons ? 1. I have u-boot running on my board. Is there a way to achieve my goal by just using the u-boot. I am using FAT system on the SD card. 2. Is using Linux image a good idea. If yes . where can I find the linux Image for my arm board ? 3. how can i debug u-boot using the BDI2000 ? 4. I used Windows Hyperterminal to download the basic Atmel examples and it runs fine.. how can i use minicom to do it ? i configured it for 8N1 and xmodem /dev/ttyS0 but i dont see anyting which i could see throh hyperterminal in windows 5. With the Atmel MCI sample code, i can recognise my SD card but cannot save anyting .of course due to unavilaiblity of the FAT drivers. How can i solve it ? Regards Tutu
> 5. With the Atmel MCI sample code, i can recognise my SD card but cannot > save anyting .of course due to unavilaiblity of the FAT drivers. How can > i solve it ? http://www.efsl.be/ Andy
Andy Kunz wrote: >> 5. With the Atmel MCI sample code, i can recognise my SD card but cannot >> save anyting .of course due to unavilaiblity of the FAT drivers. How can >> i solve it ? > > http://www.efsl.be/ > > Andy This website looks down. Maybe try :- http://sourceforge.net/projects/efsl/
Fordp wrote: > Andy Kunz wrote: >>> 5. With the Atmel MCI sample code, i can recognise my SD card but cannot >>> save anyting .of course due to unavilaiblity of the FAT drivers. How can >>> i solve it ? >> >> http://www.efsl.be/ >> >> Andy > > This website looks down. > > Maybe try :- http://sourceforge.net/projects/efsl/ the website looks fine, except that the code is for ARM7 and also SPI. the SD card is on MCI on the Atmel ARM9 board. Looks this wouldnt help me much !
> the website looks fine, except that the code is for ARM7 and also SPI. > the SD card is on MCI on the Atmel ARM9 board. Looks this wouldnt help > me much ! It's a heck of a lot less work to adapt the physical interface than to write the FAT drivers, no? Andy
Please log in before posting. Registration is free and takes only a minute.
Existing account
Do you have a Google/GoogleMail account? No registration required!
Log in with Google account
Log in with Google account
No account? Register here.